28 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext
28 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Nth point algorithm}}{7}{figure.1}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Radial distance algorithm}}{8}{figure.2}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Perpendicular distance algorithm}}{9}{figure.3}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Reuman-Witkam algorithm}}{9}{figure.4}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Opheim algorithm}}{10}{figure.5}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Lang algorithm}}{10}{figure.6}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Douglas Peucker algorithm}}{11}{figure.7}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces UML diagram of the benchmarking application}}{21}{figure.8}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces The user interface for benchmarking application. (not final)}}{23}{figure.9}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces The state model of the application}}{28}{figure.10}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces The user interface for the algorithm comparison. (not final)}}{29}{figure.11}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}}{32}{figure.12}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}}{32}{figure.13}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}}{33}{figure.14}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {15}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}}{33}{figure.15}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {16}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}}{34}{figure.16}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {17}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}}{34}{figure.17}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {18}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}}{35}{figure.18}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {19}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}}{35}{figure.19}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {20}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Safari browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}}{36}{figure.20}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {21}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}}{36}{figure.21}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {22}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Safari browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}}{37}{figure.22}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {23}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}}{37}{figure.23}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {24}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}}{38}{figure.24}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {25}{\ignorespaces Turf.js simplify benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}}{38}{figure.25}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {26}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}}{39}{figure.26}%
|
|
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {27}{\ignorespaces Turf.js simplify benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}}{39}{figure.27}%
|