Add results
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
|
||||
<main id="root"></main>
|
||||
<footer>
|
||||
Footer
|
||||
<a href="./chart.html">Load previously saved chart</a>
|
||||
<a href="./loadChart.html">Load previously saved chart</a>
|
||||
</footer>
|
||||
|
||||
<script src="./bundle.js"></script>
|
||||
|
0
benchmarking/public/results.html
Normal file
1
benchmarking/results/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.json
Normal file
1
benchmarking/results/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.json
Normal file
1
benchmarking/results/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_false.json
Normal file
1
benchmarking/results/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_true.json
Normal file
1
benchmarking/results/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_false.json
Normal file
1
benchmarking/results/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_true.json
Normal file
1
benchmarking/results/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.json
Normal file
1
benchmarking/results/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.json
Normal file
1
benchmarking/results/win_edge_simplify_stack_true.json
Normal file
1
benchmarking/results/win_edge_simplify_vs_true.json
Normal file
@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
|
||||
\input{chapters/01-introduction.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/02.00-theory.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/02.01-Generalization.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/02.02-Dataformats.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/02.03-Algorithms.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/02.04-webruntime.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/03.00-methodology.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/03.01-benchmark.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/03.02-integration.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/04.00-results.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/04.01-results-benchmark.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/04.02-results-integration.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/05-conclusion.tex}
|
||||
\input{chapters/06-conclusion.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/01-introduction.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/02.00-theory.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/02.01-Generalization.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/02.02-Dataformats.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/02.03-Algorithms.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/02.04-webruntime.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/03.00-methodology.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/03.01-benchmark.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/03.02-integration.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/04.00-results.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/04.01-results-benchmark.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/04.02-results-integration.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/05-conclusion.tex}
|
||||
\input{./chapters/06-conclusion.tex}
|
||||
|
@ -14,20 +14,75 @@ Compression algorithms.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{n-th point algorithm}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{./images/shi-np.png}
|
||||
\caption{Nth point algorithm}
|
||||
\label{fig:algo-np}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Random-point routine}
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Radial distance algorithm}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{../lib/psimpl_v7_src/doc/psimpl_rd.png}
|
||||
\caption{Radial distance algorithm}
|
||||
\label{fig:algo-rd}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Perpendicular distance algorithm}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{../lib/psimpl_v7_src/doc/psimpl_pd.png}
|
||||
\caption{Perpendicular distance algorithm}
|
||||
\label{fig:algo-pd}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Reumann-Witkam simplification}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{../lib/psimpl_v7_src/doc/psimpl_rw.png}
|
||||
\caption{Reuman-Witkam algorithm}
|
||||
\label{fig:algo-rw}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Opheim simplification}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{../lib/psimpl_v7_src/doc/psimpl_op.png}
|
||||
\caption{Opheim algorithm}
|
||||
\label{fig:algo-op}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Lang simplification}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{../lib/psimpl_v7_src/doc/psimpl_la.png}
|
||||
\caption{Lang algorithm}
|
||||
\label{fig:algo-la}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Douglas-Peucker simplification}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{../lib/psimpl_v7_src/doc/psimpl_dp.png}
|
||||
\caption{Douglas Peucker algorithm}
|
||||
\label{fig:algo-dp}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{with reduction parameter}
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Jenks simplification}
|
||||
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Problem dimensions:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Device: desktop, smartphone
|
||||
\item Device: desktop, mobile
|
||||
\item Browser: Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, mobile variants
|
||||
\item Datasets: Simplify.js example, bavaria outline
|
||||
\item High quality: on off
|
||||
@ -22,34 +22,55 @@ Questions to answer:
|
||||
\todo[inline]{Highlight for each case which dimension is active and which questions it tackles}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Device 1 - Windows - wasm vs js}
|
||||
\marginpar{hp pavilion}
|
||||
|
||||
\todo[inline]{desktop | chrome, ff, edge | simplify.js | on, off | wasm vs js = 6 charts}
|
||||
\todo[inline]{questions: 1, 3, 5}
|
||||
|
||||
Benchmark of dataset "Simplify.js example" using the web browsers of Google, Microsoft and Mozilla.
|
||||
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_false}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_false}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_false}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_true}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_true}
|
||||
% \input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_true}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_false.tex}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_false.tex}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_false.tex}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_true.tex}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_true.tex}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_true.tex}
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Device 1 - Windows - wasm stack analysis}
|
||||
\todo[inline]{desktop | edge, firefox | simplify.js | on, off | wasm stack = 6 charts}
|
||||
\todo[inline]{1, 2, 3, 5}
|
||||
\marginpar{hp pavilion}
|
||||
\todo[inline]{desktop | edge | simplify.js | on, off | wasm stack = 2 charts}
|
||||
\todo[inline]{questions: 2, 3, 5}
|
||||
\marginpar{maybe add ffox}
|
||||
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_false}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_false.tex}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_true.tex}
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Device 2 - iMac - wasm vs js}
|
||||
\subsubsection{Device 2 - MacBook Pro - wasm vs js}
|
||||
\marginpar{MacBook Pro 15}
|
||||
\marginpar{Chrome and FF comparable to results above}
|
||||
|
||||
For safari browser.
|
||||
|
||||
\todo[inline]{desktop | safari, ffox | bavaria.js | on, off | vs = 4 charts}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_false.tex}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.tex}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_true.tex}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.tex}
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Device 3 - Ubuntu - turf.js analysis}
|
||||
\marginpar{Lenovo Miix 510}
|
||||
\marginpar{Firefox because orig simplify is faster}
|
||||
\todo[inline]{desktop | ff | bavaria | on, off | vs, turf Stack = 4 charts}
|
||||
|
||||
Check if turf makes sense
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.tex}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_false.tex}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.tex}
|
||||
\input{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_true.tex}
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Device 4 - iPhone - mobile testing}
|
||||
|
||||
\todo[inline]{mobile | safari, chrome, ffox | on, off | vs = 6 charts}
|
||||
|
@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
|
||||
# for i in $(ls chapters); do printf '\\input{chapters/%s}\n\\newpage\n\n' $i; done > chapters.tex
|
||||
for i in $(ls chapters); do printf '\\input{chapters/%s}\n' $i; done > chapters.tex
|
||||
for i in ./chapters/*.tex; do printf '\\input{%s}\n' $i; done > chapters.tex
|
||||
|
BIN
thesis/images/shi-np.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 53 KiB |
@ -1,10 +1,27 @@
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces UML diagram of the benchmarking application}}{17}{figure.1}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces The user interface for benchmarking application. (not final)}}{19}{figure.2}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces The state model of the application}}{24}{figure.3}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces The user interface for the algorithm comparison. (not final)}}{25}{figure.4}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}}{28}{figure.5}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}}{28}{figure.6}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}}{29}{figure.7}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high Quality mode.}}{29}{figure.8}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high Quality mode.}}{30}{figure.9}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}}{31}{figure.10}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Nth point algorithm}}{7}{figure.1}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Radial distance algorithm}}{8}{figure.2}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Perpendicular distance algorithm}}{9}{figure.3}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Reuman-Witkam algorithm}}{9}{figure.4}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Opheim algorithm}}{10}{figure.5}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Lang algorithm}}{10}{figure.6}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Douglas Peucker algorithm}}{11}{figure.7}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces UML diagram of the benchmarking application}}{21}{figure.8}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces The user interface for benchmarking application. (not final)}}{23}{figure.9}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces The state model of the application}}{28}{figure.10}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces The user interface for the algorithm comparison. (not final)}}{29}{figure.11}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}}{32}{figure.12}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}}{32}{figure.13}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}}{33}{figure.14}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {15}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}}{33}{figure.15}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {16}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}}{34}{figure.16}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {17}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}}{34}{figure.17}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {18}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}}{35}{figure.18}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {19}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}}{35}{figure.19}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {20}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Safari browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}}{36}{figure.20}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {21}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}}{36}{figure.21}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {22}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Safari browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}}{37}{figure.22}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {23}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}}{37}{figure.23}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {24}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}}{38}{figure.24}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {25}{\ignorespaces Turf.js simplify benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}}{38}{figure.25}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {26}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}}{39}{figure.26}%
|
||||
\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {27}{\ignorespaces Turf.js simplify benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}}{39}{figure.27}%
|
||||
|
BIN
thesis/main.pdf
@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ Abstract goes here
|
||||
|
||||
\input{chapters.tex}
|
||||
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
\pagenumbering{gobble}
|
||||
\listoffigures
|
||||
\newpage
|
||||
\lstlistoflistings
|
||||
|
@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ caption_template = '{chart} benchmark result of {device} device with {browser} b
|
||||
|
||||
devices = {
|
||||
'win': 'Windows',
|
||||
'mac': 'MacBook Pro',
|
||||
'ubu': 'Ubuntu',
|
||||
'iph': 'iPhone'
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
browsers = {
|
||||
@ -29,12 +32,13 @@ data = {
|
||||
|
||||
chart = {
|
||||
'vs': 'Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js',
|
||||
'stack': 'Simplify.wasm runtime analysis'
|
||||
'stack': 'Simplify.wasm runtime analysis',
|
||||
'jsstack': 'Turf.js simplify'
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
highQual = {
|
||||
'true': 'with high Quality mode',
|
||||
'false': 'without high Quality mode'
|
||||
'true': 'with high quality mode',
|
||||
'false': 'without high quality mode'
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
BIN
thesis/results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 58 KiB |
7
thesis/results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.tex
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_false}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
BIN
thesis/results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 61 KiB |
7
thesis/results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.tex
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_true}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
BIN
thesis/results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_false.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 61 KiB |
7
thesis/results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_false.tex
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_false.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Safari browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:mac_safa_bavaria_vs_false}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
BIN
thesis/results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_true.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 58 KiB |
7
thesis/results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_true.tex
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_true.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Safari browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:mac_safa_bavaria_vs_true}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
BIN
thesis/results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_false.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 56 KiB |
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_false.png}
|
||||
\caption{Turf.js simplify benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_false}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
BIN
thesis/results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_true.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 57 KiB |
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_true.png}
|
||||
\caption{Turf.js simplify benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_true}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
BIN
thesis/results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 58 KiB |
7
thesis/results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.tex
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_false}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
BIN
thesis/results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 56 KiB |
7
thesis/results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.tex
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_true}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_false.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:win_chro_simplify_vs_false}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_true.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high Quality mode.}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:win_chro_simplify_vs_true}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_false.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:win_edge_simplify_stack_false}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
BIN
thesis/results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_true.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 51 KiB |
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_true.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:win_edge_simplify_stack_true}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_false.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:win_edge_simplify_vs_false}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
BIN
thesis/results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_true.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 60 KiB |
7
thesis/results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_true.tex
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_true.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:win_edge_simplify_vs_true}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_false.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:win_ffox_simplify_vs_false}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!htb]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_true.png}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high Quality mode.}
|
||||
\caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}
|
||||
\label{fig:win_ffox_simplify_vs_true}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|