Add results

benchmarking/public/index.html

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
     <main id="root"></main>
     <footer>
       Footer
-      <a href="./chart.html">Load previously saved chart</a>
+      <a href="./loadChart.html">Load previously saved chart</a>
     </footer>
 
     <script src="./bundle.js"></script>

thesis/chapters.tex

@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
-\input{chapters/01-introduction.tex}
+\input{./chapters/01-introduction.tex}
-\input{chapters/02.00-theory.tex}
+\input{./chapters/02.00-theory.tex}
-\input{chapters/02.01-Generalization.tex}
+\input{./chapters/02.01-Generalization.tex}
-\input{chapters/02.02-Dataformats.tex}
+\input{./chapters/02.02-Dataformats.tex}
-\input{chapters/02.03-Algorithms.tex}
+\input{./chapters/02.03-Algorithms.tex}
-\input{chapters/02.04-webruntime.tex}
+\input{./chapters/02.04-webruntime.tex}
-\input{chapters/03.00-methodology.tex}
+\input{./chapters/03.00-methodology.tex}
-\input{chapters/03.01-benchmark.tex}
+\input{./chapters/03.01-benchmark.tex}
-\input{chapters/03.02-integration.tex}
+\input{./chapters/03.02-integration.tex}
-\input{chapters/04.00-results.tex}
+\input{./chapters/04.00-results.tex}
-\input{chapters/04.01-results-benchmark.tex}
+\input{./chapters/04.01-results-benchmark.tex}
-\input{chapters/04.02-results-integration.tex}
+\input{./chapters/04.02-results-integration.tex}
-\input{chapters/05-conclusion.tex}
+\input{./chapters/05-conclusion.tex}
-\input{chapters/06-conclusion.tex}
+\input{./chapters/06-conclusion.tex}

thesis/chapters/02.03-Algorithms.tex

@@ -14,20 +14,75 @@ Compression algorithms.
 
 \paragraph{n-th point algorithm}
 
+\begin{figure}
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{./images/shi-np.png}
+	\caption{Nth point algorithm}
+	\label{fig:algo-np}
+\end{figure}
+
 \paragraph{Random-point routine}
 
 \paragraph{Radial distance algorithm}
 
+\begin{figure}
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{../lib/psimpl_v7_src/doc/psimpl_rd.png}
+	\caption{Radial distance algorithm}
+	\label{fig:algo-rd}
+\end{figure}
+
+
 \paragraph{Perpendicular distance algorithm}
 
+\begin{figure}
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{../lib/psimpl_v7_src/doc/psimpl_pd.png}
+	\caption{Perpendicular distance algorithm}
+	\label{fig:algo-pd}
+\end{figure}
+
+
 \paragraph{Reumann-Witkam simplification}
 
+\begin{figure}
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{../lib/psimpl_v7_src/doc/psimpl_rw.png}
+	\caption{Reuman-Witkam algorithm}
+	\label{fig:algo-rw}
+\end{figure}
+
+
 \paragraph{Opheim simplification}
 
+\begin{figure}
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{../lib/psimpl_v7_src/doc/psimpl_op.png}
+	\caption{Opheim algorithm}
+	\label{fig:algo-op}
+\end{figure}
+
+
 \paragraph{Lang simplification}
 
+\begin{figure}
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{../lib/psimpl_v7_src/doc/psimpl_la.png}
+	\caption{Lang algorithm}
+	\label{fig:algo-la}
+\end{figure}
+
+
 \paragraph{Douglas-Peucker simplification}
 
+\begin{figure}
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=.7\linewidth]{../lib/psimpl_v7_src/doc/psimpl_dp.png}
+	\caption{Douglas Peucker algorithm}
+	\label{fig:algo-dp}
+\end{figure}
+
+
 \paragraph{with reduction parameter}
 
 \paragraph{Jenks simplification}

thesis/chapters/04.01-results-benchmark.tex

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Problem dimensions:
 \begin{itemize}
-	\item Device: desktop, smartphone
+	\item Device: desktop, mobile
 	\item Browser: Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, mobile variants
 	\item Datasets: Simplify.js example, bavaria outline
 	\item High quality: on off
@@ -22,34 +22,55 @@ Questions to answer:
 \todo[inline]{Highlight for each case which dimension is active and which questions it tackles}
 
 \subsubsection{Device 1 - Windows - wasm vs js}
+\marginpar{hp pavilion}
 
 \todo[inline]{desktop | chrome, ff, edge | simplify.js | on, off | wasm vs js = 6 charts}
 \todo[inline]{questions: 1, 3, 5}
 
 Benchmark of dataset "Simplify.js example" using the web browsers of Google, Microsoft and Mozilla.
 
-\input{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_false}
+\input{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_false.tex}
-\input{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_false}
+\input{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_false.tex}
-\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_false}
+\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_false.tex}
-\input{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_true}
+\input{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_true.tex}
-\input{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_true}
+\input{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_true.tex}
-% \input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_true}
+\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_true.tex}
 \clearpage
 
 \subsubsection{Device 1 - Windows - wasm stack analysis}
-\todo[inline]{desktop | edge, firefox | simplify.js | on, off | wasm stack = 6 charts}
+\marginpar{hp pavilion}
-\todo[inline]{1, 2, 3, 5}
+\todo[inline]{desktop | edge | simplify.js | on, off | wasm stack = 2 charts}
+\todo[inline]{questions: 2, 3, 5}
+\marginpar{maybe add ffox}
 
-\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_false}
+\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_false.tex}
+\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_true.tex}
 \clearpage
 
-\subsubsection{Device 2 - iMac - wasm vs js}
+\subsubsection{Device 2 - MacBook Pro - wasm vs js}
+\marginpar{MacBook Pro 15}
+\marginpar{Chrome and FF comparable to results above}
 
-For safari browser.
+\todo[inline]{desktop | safari, ffox | bavaria.js | on, off | vs = 4 charts}
- 
+
+
+\input{./results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_false.tex}
+\input{./results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.tex}
+\input{./results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_true.tex}
+\input{./results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.tex}
+\clearpage
 
 \subsubsection{Device 3 - Ubuntu - turf.js analysis}
+\marginpar{Lenovo Miix 510}
+\marginpar{Firefox because orig simplify is faster}
+\todo[inline]{desktop | ff | bavaria | on, off | vs, turf Stack = 4 charts}
 
-Check if turf makes sense
+\input{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.tex}
+\input{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_false.tex}
+\input{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.tex}
+\input{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_true.tex}
+\clearpage
 
 \subsubsection{Device 4 - iPhone - mobile testing}
+
+\todo[inline]{mobile | safari, chrome, ffox | on, off | vs = 6 charts}

thesis/generate-chapters.sh

@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 # for i in $(ls chapters); do printf '\\input{chapters/%s}\n\\newpage\n\n' $i; done > chapters.tex
-for i in $(ls chapters); do printf '\\input{chapters/%s}\n' $i; done > chapters.tex
+for i in ./chapters/*.tex; do printf '\\input{%s}\n' $i; done > chapters.tex

thesis/main.lof

@@ -1,10 +1,27 @@
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces UML diagram of the benchmarking application}}{17}{figure.1}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Nth point algorithm}}{7}{figure.1}% 
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces The user interface for benchmarking application. (not final)}}{19}{figure.2}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Radial distance algorithm}}{8}{figure.2}% 
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces The state model of the application}}{24}{figure.3}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Perpendicular distance algorithm}}{9}{figure.3}% 
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces The user interface for the algorithm comparison. (not final)}}{25}{figure.4}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Reuman-Witkam algorithm}}{9}{figure.4}% 
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}}{28}{figure.5}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Opheim algorithm}}{10}{figure.5}% 
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}}{28}{figure.6}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Lang algorithm}}{10}{figure.6}% 
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}}{29}{figure.7}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Douglas Peucker algorithm}}{11}{figure.7}% 
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high Quality mode.}}{29}{figure.8}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces UML diagram of the benchmarking application}}{21}{figure.8}% 
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high Quality mode.}}{30}{figure.9}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces The user interface for benchmarking application. (not final)}}{23}{figure.9}% 
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}}{31}{figure.10}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces The state model of the application}}{28}{figure.10}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces The user interface for the algorithm comparison. (not final)}}{29}{figure.11}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}}{32}{figure.12}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}}{32}{figure.13}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}}{33}{figure.14}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {15}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}}{33}{figure.15}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {16}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}}{34}{figure.16}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {17}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}}{34}{figure.17}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {18}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}}{35}{figure.18}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {19}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}}{35}{figure.19}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {20}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Safari browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}}{36}{figure.20}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {21}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}}{36}{figure.21}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {22}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Safari browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}}{37}{figure.22}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {23}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}}{37}{figure.23}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {24}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}}{38}{figure.24}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {25}{\ignorespaces Turf.js simplify benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}}{38}{figure.25}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {26}{\ignorespaces Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}}{39}{figure.26}% 
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {27}{\ignorespaces Turf.js simplify benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}}{39}{figure.27}% 

thesis/main.tex

@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ Abstract goes here
 
 \input{chapters.tex}
 
+\clearpage
+\pagenumbering{gobble}
 \listoffigures
 \newpage
 \lstlistoflistings

thesis/results-benchmark/gen-tex.py

@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ caption_template = '{chart} benchmark result of {device} device with {browser} b
 
 devices = {
     'win': 'Windows',
+    'mac': 'MacBook Pro',
+    'ubu': 'Ubuntu',
+    'iph': 'iPhone'
 }
 
 browsers = {
@@ -29,12 +32,13 @@ data = {
 
 chart = {
     'vs': 'Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js',
-    'stack': 'Simplify.wasm runtime analysis'
+    'stack': 'Simplify.wasm runtime analysis',
+    'jsstack': 'Turf.js simplify'
 }
 
 highQual = {
-    'true': 'with high Quality mode',
+    'true': 'with high quality mode',
-    'false': 'without high Quality mode'
+    'false': 'without high quality mode'
 }
 
 

thesis/results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+\begin{figure}[!htb]
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.png}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}
+    \label{fig:mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_false}
+\end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+\begin{figure}[!htb]
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.png}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}
+    \label{fig:mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_true}
+\end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_false.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+\begin{figure}[!htb]
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_false.png}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Safari browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}
+    \label{fig:mac_safa_bavaria_vs_false}
+\end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_true.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+\begin{figure}[!htb]
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_true.png}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of MacBook Pro device with Safari browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}
+    \label{fig:mac_safa_bavaria_vs_true}
+\end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_false.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+\begin{figure}[!htb]
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_false.png}
+    \caption{Turf.js simplify benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}
+    \label{fig:ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_false}
+\end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_true.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+\begin{figure}[!htb]
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_true.png}
+    \caption{Turf.js simplify benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}
+    \label{fig:ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_true}
+\end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+\begin{figure}[!htb]
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.png}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" without high quality mode.}
+    \label{fig:ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_false}
+\end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+\begin{figure}[!htb]
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.png}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Ubuntu device with Firefox browser on dataset "Bavaria outline" with high quality mode.}
+    \label{fig:ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_true}
+\end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_false.tex

@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htb]
     \centering
     \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_false.png}
-    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}
     \label{fig:win_chro_simplify_vs_false}
 \end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_true.tex

@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htb]
     \centering
     \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_true.png}
-    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high Quality mode.}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Chrome browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}
     \label{fig:win_chro_simplify_vs_true}
 \end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_false.tex

@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htb]
     \centering
     \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_false.png}
-    \caption{Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}
     \label{fig:win_edge_simplify_stack_false}
 \end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_true.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+\begin{figure}[!htb]
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_true.png}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm runtime analysis benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}
+    \label{fig:win_edge_simplify_stack_true}
+\end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_false.tex

@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htb]
     \centering
     \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_false.png}
-    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}
     \label{fig:win_edge_simplify_vs_false}
 \end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_true.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+\begin{figure}[!htb]
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_true.png}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Edge browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}
+    \label{fig:win_edge_simplify_vs_true}
+\end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_false.tex

@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htb]
     \centering
     \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_false.png}
-    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high Quality mode.}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" without high quality mode.}
     \label{fig:win_ffox_simplify_vs_false}
 \end{figure}

thesis/results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_true.tex

@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htb]
     \centering
     \includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_true.png}
-    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high Quality mode.}
+    \caption{Simplify.wasm vs. Simplify.js benchmark result of Windows device with Firefox browser on dataset "Simplify.js example" with high quality mode.}
     \label{fig:win_ffox_simplify_vs_true}
 \end{figure}