103 lines
3.2 KiB
TeX
103 lines
3.2 KiB
TeX
\subsection{Benchmark results}
|
|
|
|
Problem dimensions:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Device: desktop, mobile
|
|
\item Browser: Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, mobile variants
|
|
\item Datasets: Simplify.js example, bavaria outline
|
|
\item High quality: on off
|
|
\item Chart: wasm vs. js, wasm analysis, js analysis
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
Questions to answer:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Differences between browsers?
|
|
\item How much influence does the environment change has (storeCoords)?
|
|
\item What is faster? js or wasm. In which cases?
|
|
\item Is turf making sense?
|
|
\item How much influence does high Quality mode has.
|
|
\item Difference between devices?
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\todo[inline]{Highlight for each case which dimension is active and which questions it tackles}
|
|
|
|
\subsubsection{Case 1 - Windows - wasm vs js}
|
|
\marginpar{hp pavilion}
|
|
\marginpar{6 charts}
|
|
\marginpar{questions: 1, 3, 5}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{./images/dimensions-1.png}
|
|
\label{tbl:dimensions-1}
|
|
\caption{Problem dimensions of Case 1}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
Benchmark of dataset "Simplify.js example" using the web browsers of Google, Microsoft and Mozilla.
|
|
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_false.tex}
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_false.tex}
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_false.tex}
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/win_chro_simplify_vs_true.tex}
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/win_ffox_simplify_vs_true.tex}
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_vs_true.tex}
|
|
\clearpage
|
|
|
|
\subsubsection{Case 2 - Windows - wasm stack analysis}
|
|
\marginpar{hp pavilion}
|
|
\marginpar{2 charts}
|
|
\marginpar{questions: 2, 3, 5}
|
|
\todo{maybe add ffox}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{./images/dimensions-2.png}
|
|
\label{tbl:dimensions-2}
|
|
\caption{Problem dimensions of Case 2}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_false.tex}
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/win_edge_simplify_stack_true.tex}
|
|
\clearpage
|
|
|
|
\subsubsection{Case 3 - MacBook Pro - wasm vs js}
|
|
\marginpar{MacBook Pro 15}
|
|
\marginpar{4 charts}
|
|
\marginpar{Chrome and FF comparable to results above}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{./images/dimensions-3.png}
|
|
\label{tbl:dimensions-3}
|
|
\caption{Problem dimensions of Case 3}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_false.tex}
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.tex}
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/mac_safa_bavaria_vs_true.tex}
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/mac_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.tex}
|
|
\clearpage
|
|
|
|
\subsubsection{Case 4 - Ubuntu - turf.js analysis}
|
|
\marginpar{Lenovo Miix 510}
|
|
\marginpar{4 charts}
|
|
\marginpar{Firefox because orig simplify is faster}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{./images/dimensions-4.png}
|
|
\label{tbl:dimensions-4}
|
|
\caption{Problem dimensions of Case 4}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_false.tex}
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_false.tex}
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_vs_true.tex}
|
|
\input{./results-benchmark/ubu_ffox_bavaria_jsstack_true.tex}
|
|
\clearpage
|
|
|
|
\subsubsection{Device 4 - iPhone - mobile testing}
|
|
|
|
\todo[inline]{mobile | safari, chrome, ffox | on, off | vs = 6 charts}
|